Bank's offer to fund vandalism repairs draws activist backlash

Thousands of protesters demonstrated outside Wells Fargo's April 26 annual shareholders' meeting.
Yael Chanoff

After young anarchists vandalized cars and businesses during a brief but destructive rampage through the Mission District last week, Wells Fargo was quick to offer $25,000 in grants to repair the damage, which the bank publicized in a press release as “building upon its history of supporting local communities.”

Yet this is the same Wells Fargo that has been targeted by housing rights, labor, and other progressive activists in recent months for its aggressive foreclosure tactics and investments in mountaintop removal coal mining and other heinous activities, culminating in a major standoff between protesters and the company during its annual shareholders meeting in San Francisco on April 24.

The grant money was supposed to be administered mostly by the Valencia Corridor Merchants Association, but the group got an earful from activists during its meeting on Monday night and now its leaders are figuring out how they can extricate themselves from this thorny situation. Among those putting pressure on the group is Sara Shortt, executive director of the Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, who says the bank is trying to buy allies that it desperately needs right now.

"Wells is trying to divide a wedge between activists who have been working to highlight their irresponsible practices in the community and the businesses we shop at,” Shortt told us. "As a Valencia Street resident, I resent that they are hoping to use my community merchants as a tool for them to gain positive PR, by taking advantage of their desperation after the attacks.”

Bank spokesperson Holly Rockwood emphasized Wells Fargo's “long history of corporate philanthropy” when I asked her about the donation, and she denied that the corporation was trying to burnish its tarnished image less than week after thousands of activists disrupted the bank's annual meeting, resulting in 20 arrests. “The timing was simply in response to the wave of vandalism,” Rockwood said.

Nonetheless, merchants association President Deena Davenport said the group is now “backing away from this” to avoid getting in the middle of this fight. “The people with the Housing Rights Committee gave us a lot of good reasons why shouldn't accept this money,” she said, adding that the association will make a final decision at its meeting this Monday.

While she said that she appreciates the bank's offer and doesn't begrudge anyone who wants to accept the money, “we are looking at ways to raise the money ourselves,” including reaching out to local credit unions to see if they would match the Wells Fargo offer, making the same money available but without the heavy political baggage.


If that's true, why would the mayor and the BoS's feel the need to pass legislation banning SFPD-FBI surveillance of SF citizens, among other actions they've taken. Could it be because history is often repeated when we're not vigilant?

Posted by Guest on May. 11, 2012 @ 1:45 pm

Do you have any polls showing the percentage of people who regard Occupy as significant?

I'd guess it comes out around 1%. Hmmmmf.

Posted by Guest on May. 11, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

The beats were poets, the hippies were flower children, the punks tore up hotel rooms, the useless Occupy with no goals, no intelligence, no nothing, shit in tents and throw the scat at police.

Posted by Guest on May. 12, 2012 @ 6:45 pm

Wake up to Wells Fargo's repeated public lies.

Posted by Guest on May. 11, 2012 @ 6:20 pm

Someone is fixing their vandalism?

If these people are so upset about Wells Fargo tossing in some cash they should pay the bills or crawl back under their rocks.

Posted by Matlock on May. 13, 2012 @ 1:50 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.